<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.integralcompany.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>item responding</title>
 <link>http://www.integralcompany.com/taxonomy/term/430/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Make Personality Tests More Relevant – Put Them In Context</title>
 <link>http://www.integralcompany.com/blog/tom-goddard/make-personality-tests-more-relevant-put-them-in-context</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Personality tests are valid – to a point.  It’s almost undisputed that the major personality tests generally tell us something useful about a person.  But how much they tell us is usually pretty small – they make us only slightly smarter about the person taking the test. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/integralcompany.peerproducers.net/files/images/no-personality.thumbnail.jpg&quot; class=&quot;image thumbnail&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; width=&quot;97&quot; /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;So, how do you change the tests so they make us more than just slightly smarter?  Context, context, context!  One name used for context is “frame of reference.”  So, instead of a context-free item like “I pay attention to details,” you go with an item like “I pay attention to details at work.”     &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Lievens and his colleagues challenged the conventional wisdom about why context works.  It has been widely argued that contexts reduces the variability among test-takers, making it less likely that some of the test takers will answer a question across all contexts and others will self-select a context in which they interpret the test questions.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.integralcompany.com/blog/tom-goddard/make-personality-tests-more-relevant-put-them-in-context&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.integralcompany.com/blog/tom-goddard/make-personality-tests-more-relevant-put-them-in-context#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/context">context</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/criterion-related-validity">criterion-related validity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/frame-of-reference">frame of reference</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/industrial-organizational-psychology">Industrial-Organizational Psychology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/item-responding">item responding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/personality-scales">personality scales</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/reliability">reliability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/context-0">context</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/criterion-related-validity-0">criterion-related validity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/frame-of-reference-0">frame of reference</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/industrial-organizational-psychology-0">Industrial-Organizational Psychology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/item-responding-0">item responding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/personality-scales-0">personality scales</category>
 <category domain="http://www.integralcompany.com/reliability-0">reliability</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:24:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Goddard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">226 at http://www.integralcompany.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
